Ica Stones Comprehended!

For years since their discovery, the engimatic Ica stones have attracted much negative attention. These stones, which the patina off was chipped off and a lighter "petraglyph" remained, show images so fantastical they were considered a hoax and the farmer who was finding them had admitted under threat of arrest he made all 15,000 of them.

"Dr. Cabrera became the prime customer for the stones, and the farmer apparently had an endless supply. Dr. Cabrera questioned the farmer about carving the stones. The farmer was evasive and maintained his story about created them himself for fear of being arrested again and put in jail for the rest of his life. "

These stone are complete engimatic under the current paradigm, but under the Electric Universe Cosolmology, the stones explain themselves.

Many depictions show, obvious plasma discharges, dateable discharges, such as the "Tree of Life" depicted on the stone above. If that event was dated to circa 3400BC, we may be able to see a window into the life of the people who live in patagonia and around the area during the time of the "Gods". This is a very important find that lends credence even with the censorship of the 15,000 finds.

Even more interesting is the medicine and dinosaurs that are depicted. Are they legitimate instructions or are the interpretations of skyward views. Did dinosaurs live up to recent times in some places.


Even some show the Giant Comet, Venus. A treasure trove of information is being supressed by simple lack of scientific rigor. We are falling victim to magical mathematicians and the christian bias inherent in their dogma of god-induced creation.

The Scientific Dogma

"We stand at a time in scientific history that will be embarrassing to look back on from the vantage point of the next century. An entire subgroup of science consisting of a majority of astrophysicists and cosmologists is now -- and has been -- smugly ignoring the fruits of 150 or so years of electrical science. This subgroup feels perfectly confident in postulating the existence of processes and entities that cannot be verified experimentally in earthbound labs. But that doesn't mean those processes can't happen in space, they say. When there are perfectly valid electrical explanations for certain phenomena, it is irresponsible to ignore those explanations and invent new science to avoid using them. People will ask, years from now, How could they have ignored electricity in space when it was staring them in the face?"

"Classic astronomy (and its offshoots: helioseismology, astrophysics, cosmology, etc.) have never made any real predictions that turned out to be true although they are past-masters at inventing dynamos and invisible entities to explain things retroactively. After-the-fact explanations are easy, especially if you can get away with saying, The hidden dynamo did it.... [C]lassical astronomers were wrong about how the auroras are powered, about the temperature of Venus, about the rocky nature of comets, about x-rays coming from comets and other objects, about the existence of natural radio emissions from the planets. And I claim they are wrong about many things they are now saying about the Sun."

"... The standard astrophysical models are far more speculative [than the Electric Sun model]. They are built up of speculation cantilevered onto speculation that is ever farther removed from any empirical basis. And a tremendous amount of doubt is piling up about them. They do not explain (without ad hoc and a posteriori adjustments) many of the observations that are being made as the Electric Sun model does. (The fusion model doesn't even explain why the solar corona exists in the first place, let alone its three million Kelvin temperature inversion.) Each time new data comes in from space probes, astronomers typically announce their surprise and rush back to the drawing board. They then busy themselves modifying (adding complexity to) their models -- reminiscent of Ptolemaic epicycles -- and emerge confidently claiming they knew this all along. In the one case where they deigned to make reference to anything electrical (the release of magnetic energy) they got it wrong and had to discover new properties of magnetic fields that do not exist."
- Donald E. Scott - Electrical Engineer

... An Understatement?

A report on the expansion of the Universe has cause me humour. Due to the hubris of the claims that are being made, I find only the possibility that we could be so arrogant to make the claim (then add the only truth and wisdom in the whole piece, just at the end) to be an embarrassment of science.

Now, physicists Lawrence Krauss from Case Western Reserve University and Robert J. Scherrer from Vanderbilt University predict that trillions of years into the future, the information that currently allows us to understand how the universe expands will have disappeared over the visible horizon. What remains will be "an island universe" made from the Milky Way and its nearby galactic Local Group neighbors in an overwhelmingly dark void.

How can this largely filimentary structure, which is shown to be in constant evolution possibly fly apart? When have we ever seen evidence of this?

What appears almost as a story from science fiction, the cosmologists began to envision a universe based on "what ifs." Long after the demise of the solar system, it will be up to future physicists that arise from planets in other solar systems to fathom and unravel the mysteries of the system’s origins from their isolated universes dominated by dark energy.

"We live in a special time in the evolution of the universe," stated the researchers, somewhat humorously: "The only time at which we can observationally verify that we live in a very special time in the evolution of the universe."

Accurately the skepticism of the writer shows through. This is a story, made up of incorrect assumptions and 'what ifs', the evidence of this is minimal. The ego of the scientist, sure of their assumptions, shows through, however.

Krauss closed with a comment that he suggested is implicit in the paper’s conclusions. "We may feel smug in that we can detect a host of things future civilizations will not know about, but by the same token, this suggests we wonder about what important aspects of the universe we ourselves may be missing. Thus, our results suggest a kind of a ‘cosmic humility’".

Maybe you are missing something. That something is electricity. From Thunderbolts.info:

The Big Bang, which fails to take the electrical properties of plasma into account, assumes that redshift must be an indicator of distance. As a result, it projects the high-redshift filaments and arcs far into the background. In order to account for the association of these features with foreground galaxies, gravitational lensing must be invoked to “explain away” the number of features as multiple images of only one “distant” QSO. But even this subterfuge is in vain: The number of the allegedly distant objects should, on the astronomers' assumptions, increase with faintness, but observed numbers actually decrease.