The Seven Seas, a phrase used to indicate a place that gods and other mystical, or quasi-historical sailed. Was this a legitmation of a celestial symbol? Which symbol was it?
Medieval European and Arabic literature often spoke of the Seven Seas. Which seven seas are intended depends on the context. "Seven Seas" was a commonplace phrase in many ancient literatures before it was taken up by the Greeks and Romans; it appears in a translation of one of Enheduanna's hymns to Inanna (Hymn 8), written about 2300 BC in Sumer.
One possibility that can make sense in a new world based on Electromagnetic forces would be that boat symbol, the symbol which gods "sail" the seven seas, is the sunlit part of the god, then the Seven Seas would be that which the boat sails.
"In the XIXth Dynasty we know that the Tuat [the Underworld] was believed to be situated not below our earth, but away beyond the earth, probably in the sky."
-- E. Budge, quoted by Cardona, 1994.
This accounted for the idea that, to the south, the Seven Seas were, in the sky. The Ring's of Earth. Seven, possibly 9, according to Olmecs, since they lived on mountains and were 10 degree's further south than their mediterranian contemporaries. This is sourceable from the "Chilam Balam".
The Egyptians did use words that accurately seemed to reflect this arrangment:
"...a clue as to its real nature [of the Duat] comes to us from its description as having been divided into regions each of which, among other things, was called 'qerert' -- an Egyptian word that means 'circle.'"
If this is true, it would have a very large gap in these rings that would travel through the skies every night. That would be the 'doorway through the underworld.' This, of course, would be, in actuality, the earth's shadow.
What happened to this ring system? Why do we not have one now, even though all magnetic planets have them? It could have been disrupted during the arrival and orbit of the moon.
Recently, Saturn's rings have been in the news refering to how they seem to be in constant motion, moving to and from each other.
"The rings are different from the picture we had in our minds," said Larry Esposito of the University of Colorado at Boulder, who led the study done using ultraviolet imaging.
"We originally thought we would see a uniform cloud of particles. Instead we find that the particles are clumped together with empty spaces in between."
They seem to be passing charge to one another from Saturn homopolar motor by "clumping" together when their charges differ and as the charge equalizes, they drift apart.
This could be accounting for the Olmec's word that refer to the rings as "The House of Nine Rushes". What is a "Rush"? A website dealing with the River Styx in Mythology indicates:
"And there [in Hades] is housed a goddess loathed even by the immortals: dreaded Styx, eldest daughter of Okeanos, who flows back on himself, and apart from the gods she lives in her famous palace which is overroofed with towering rocks, and the whole circuit is undergirded with silver columns, and pushes heaven; and seldom does ... " -Statius, Thebaid 8.21
"That cold water [of the River Styx] that drizzles down from a steep sky-climbing cliffside, and it is one horn of the Okeanos stream, and travels off that holy river a great course through night's blackness under the wide-wayed earth and this water is a tenth part of all, for in nine loops of silver-swirling waters, around the earth and the sea's wide ridges he tumbles into salt water, but this stream, greatly vexing the gods, runs off the precipice ... the imperishable, primevil water of Styx; and it jets down through jagged country [Hesiod may also be describing the Arkadian stream]." - Hesiod, Theogony 775
It seems that those Olmecs, surrounded by oceans in the Yucatan we're not fooled into thinking the Styx/Absu was a river/ocean. It was seen differently. Like an island of firey bushes or underbrush. The following passage has much weight under this new hypothesis:
"On this side Styx encircling its nine regions, on that a barrier of fiery torrents [Pyriphlegethon] encloses his [Hermes descending into the underworld] path." - Statius, Thebaid 2.
It appears that the ancients of the past we're being as accurate as they could be, we simply did not have the capacity to understand their words for over 2500 years.
Thursday, May 24, 2007
... An Understatement?
A report on the expansion of the Universe has cause me humour. Due to the hubris of the claims that are being made, I find only the possibility that we could be so arrogant to make the claim (then add the only truth and wisdom in the whole piece, just at the end) to be an embarrassment of science.
Now, physicists Lawrence Krauss from Case Western Reserve University and Robert J. Scherrer from Vanderbilt University predict that trillions of years into the future, the information that currently allows us to understand how the universe expands will have disappeared over the visible horizon. What remains will be "an island universe" made from the Milky Way and its nearby galactic Local Group neighbors in an overwhelmingly dark void.
How can this largely filimentary structure, which is shown to be in constant evolution possibly fly apart? When have we ever seen evidence of this?
What appears almost as a story from science fiction, the cosmologists began to envision a universe based on "what ifs." Long after the demise of the solar system, it will be up to future physicists that arise from planets in other solar systems to fathom and unravel the mysteries of the system’s origins from their isolated universes dominated by dark energy.
"We live in a special time in the evolution of the universe," stated the researchers, somewhat humorously: "The only time at which we can observationally verify that we live in a very special time in the evolution of the universe."
Accurately the skepticism of the writer shows through. This is a story, made up of incorrect assumptions and 'what ifs', the evidence of this is minimal. The ego of the scientist, sure of their assumptions, shows through, however.
Krauss closed with a comment that he suggested is implicit in the paper’s conclusions. "We may feel smug in that we can detect a host of things future civilizations will not know about, but by the same token, this suggests we wonder about what important aspects of the universe we ourselves may be missing. Thus, our results suggest a kind of a ‘cosmic humility’".
Maybe you are missing something. That something is electricity. From Thunderbolts.info:
The Big Bang, which fails to take the electrical properties of plasma into account, assumes that redshift must be an indicator of distance. As a result, it projects the high-redshift filaments and arcs far into the background. In order to account for the association of these features with foreground galaxies, gravitational lensing must be invoked to “explain away” the number of features as multiple images of only one “distant” QSO. But even this subterfuge is in vain: The number of the allegedly distant objects should, on the astronomers' assumptions, increase with faintness, but observed numbers actually decrease.
Now, physicists Lawrence Krauss from Case Western Reserve University and Robert J. Scherrer from Vanderbilt University predict that trillions of years into the future, the information that currently allows us to understand how the universe expands will have disappeared over the visible horizon. What remains will be "an island universe" made from the Milky Way and its nearby galactic Local Group neighbors in an overwhelmingly dark void.
How can this largely filimentary structure, which is shown to be in constant evolution possibly fly apart? When have we ever seen evidence of this?
What appears almost as a story from science fiction, the cosmologists began to envision a universe based on "what ifs." Long after the demise of the solar system, it will be up to future physicists that arise from planets in other solar systems to fathom and unravel the mysteries of the system’s origins from their isolated universes dominated by dark energy.
"We live in a special time in the evolution of the universe," stated the researchers, somewhat humorously: "The only time at which we can observationally verify that we live in a very special time in the evolution of the universe."
Accurately the skepticism of the writer shows through. This is a story, made up of incorrect assumptions and 'what ifs', the evidence of this is minimal. The ego of the scientist, sure of their assumptions, shows through, however.
Krauss closed with a comment that he suggested is implicit in the paper’s conclusions. "We may feel smug in that we can detect a host of things future civilizations will not know about, but by the same token, this suggests we wonder about what important aspects of the universe we ourselves may be missing. Thus, our results suggest a kind of a ‘cosmic humility’".
Maybe you are missing something. That something is electricity. From Thunderbolts.info:
The Big Bang, which fails to take the electrical properties of plasma into account, assumes that redshift must be an indicator of distance. As a result, it projects the high-redshift filaments and arcs far into the background. In order to account for the association of these features with foreground galaxies, gravitational lensing must be invoked to “explain away” the number of features as multiple images of only one “distant” QSO. But even this subterfuge is in vain: The number of the allegedly distant objects should, on the astronomers' assumptions, increase with faintness, but observed numbers actually decrease.
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
Salisbury "Whirlwind"
What power can make a whirlwind form? What creates charge seperation in a cloud of dust? According to electrial theorists, it doesn't happen, in clouds, nor dust.
Salisbury just got struck with a 'whirlwind' of some power. Powerful enough to throw Ms. Scott's trailer over her house.
Her son looked out the window to find the trailer in a heap, and yet a trampoline only a few metres away was unscathed.
The sky was still clear, and the winds calm again, as if nothing ever happened.
There were come interesting inconsistencies that seems to indicate wind is not the only factor:
"The wife says the wind was blowing north and then the trailer was blowing through the air the other way."
Herb Thoms, a meteorologist with Environment Canada, believes the phenomenon was a whirlwind -- albeit an unusually powerful one.
"It is very rare they would get big enough to do what this one did," Mr. Thoms said.
However, the situation perfectly fits the profile of a whirlwind that develops very quickly and then disappears just as fast -- sometimes in seconds.
This mystery can be dealt with. There is surprising energy deficit in the idea that movement of wind can generate charge seperation to the level that it can lift structures off the ground. With a tornado there is an acceptance that the wind is more sufficent at lifting objects off the ground. But can a whirlwind?
From Thunderbolts.info:
The mechanical explanation ignores many of the conditions from which whirlwinds arise. In fair weather, with no clouds in the sky, an electric field can be measured. It amounts to about 100 volts per meter. This field is coupled to a complex of “double layers” (plasma cells), currents, and circuits that reach through the atmosphere into the magnetosphere and even into interplanetary space. Water molecules, comprising up to 4 percent of the atmosphere, have the two hydrogen atoms toward one side of each molecule and the oxygen atom toward the other. This makes each molecule a tiny electrical dipole—a pair of oppositely charged poles—subject to electrical forces. Such polar molecules will tend to line up and stick together. In a cloud they will form a leaky dielectric, storing charge and responding to the vertical atmospheric electric field.
We have been finding that on Mars, the dustdevils are obviously electrical, as the air is too thin to lift the dust off the ground.
I would bet this is 'slow electric discharge' as opposed to lighting which is 'sudden electrical discharge'.
Look here for more answers and ideas on electric weather.
Salisbury just got struck with a 'whirlwind' of some power. Powerful enough to throw Ms. Scott's trailer over her house.
Her son looked out the window to find the trailer in a heap, and yet a trampoline only a few metres away was unscathed.
The sky was still clear, and the winds calm again, as if nothing ever happened.
There were come interesting inconsistencies that seems to indicate wind is not the only factor:
"The wife says the wind was blowing north and then the trailer was blowing through the air the other way."
Herb Thoms, a meteorologist with Environment Canada, believes the phenomenon was a whirlwind -- albeit an unusually powerful one.
"It is very rare they would get big enough to do what this one did," Mr. Thoms said.
However, the situation perfectly fits the profile of a whirlwind that develops very quickly and then disappears just as fast -- sometimes in seconds.
This mystery can be dealt with. There is surprising energy deficit in the idea that movement of wind can generate charge seperation to the level that it can lift structures off the ground. With a tornado there is an acceptance that the wind is more sufficent at lifting objects off the ground. But can a whirlwind?
From Thunderbolts.info:
The mechanical explanation ignores many of the conditions from which whirlwinds arise. In fair weather, with no clouds in the sky, an electric field can be measured. It amounts to about 100 volts per meter. This field is coupled to a complex of “double layers” (plasma cells), currents, and circuits that reach through the atmosphere into the magnetosphere and even into interplanetary space. Water molecules, comprising up to 4 percent of the atmosphere, have the two hydrogen atoms toward one side of each molecule and the oxygen atom toward the other. This makes each molecule a tiny electrical dipole—a pair of oppositely charged poles—subject to electrical forces. Such polar molecules will tend to line up and stick together. In a cloud they will form a leaky dielectric, storing charge and responding to the vertical atmospheric electric field.
We have been finding that on Mars, the dustdevils are obviously electrical, as the air is too thin to lift the dust off the ground.
I would bet this is 'slow electric discharge' as opposed to lighting which is 'sudden electrical discharge'.
Look here for more answers and ideas on electric weather.
Sunday, May 13, 2007
The Shape of the Solar System
Recently, National Geographic announced that the solar system is not a sphere, but the 'heliopause' is actually "bullet shaped". Indicating it is being forced by a galactic 'wind'. This, of course, is a wrong idea, but this plasma double layer that connects the system has a shape.
It is then within the realm of consideration that this plasma sheath could glow, not unlike a "Red Giant Sun's Plasma Coma" or perhaps even Saturnian considerations/metamorphosenes, "The Fat Lady", "The Stork who brought the golden egg" and other such events.
We can see evidence of some planet's gaining coma's like comets, and we see the continuation of the electrical events in the solar system. The relation of this solar system coma to gravitation and inertial effects may be possible. It could explain why very small bodies in the asteroid belt have 'moons'.
It is then within the realm of consideration that this plasma sheath could glow, not unlike a "Red Giant Sun's Plasma Coma" or perhaps even Saturnian considerations/metamorphosenes, "The Fat Lady", "The Stork who brought the golden egg" and other such events.
We can see evidence of some planet's gaining coma's like comets, and we see the continuation of the electrical events in the solar system. The relation of this solar system coma to gravitation and inertial effects may be possible. It could explain why very small bodies in the asteroid belt have 'moons'.
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Expanding Earth
There is are so many revolutions that seem to be related and it is due to our new explorations into space and the breakdown of the institutions of higher ignorance. One that is coming to the forefront, that is likely related to the Plasma Nature of our universe, the Growing Earth. Recently, mapping of the oceans has shown that all the oceans in the world are under 250 million years old. That coincides nicely with Jno Cook's reconstructions as to when the fauna and flora changed on earth from long grow, armoured plants and such to seasonal plants. There are still leftovers from this world, which still grow slow. Like deciduous trees, and the giant redwoods.
With this concept, it is possible to envision a more dynamic earth which has distinct possibilities of gravity being altered based on the overall electrical system that links to the planet. It lends more sense to the decay rate anomalies and such that have been pointed out over time.
The largest drawback to this is a credible mechanism which allows the earth to actually grow. There is a possibility that there is a large influx of matter via protons, in the electrical medium. Perhaps it just is accumulated sentiment from space. There are many questions.
Obviously the electrical model has the creation answer, but still, it is unable to experiment with how a planet could expand. But it's quite obvious that they do.
With this concept, it is possible to envision a more dynamic earth which has distinct possibilities of gravity being altered based on the overall electrical system that links to the planet. It lends more sense to the decay rate anomalies and such that have been pointed out over time.
The largest drawback to this is a credible mechanism which allows the earth to actually grow. There is a possibility that there is a large influx of matter via protons, in the electrical medium. Perhaps it just is accumulated sentiment from space. There are many questions.
Obviously the electrical model has the creation answer, but still, it is unable to experiment with how a planet could expand. But it's quite obvious that they do.
Sunday, May 06, 2007
The Key to Symbolism
Velikovsky was asked once, "What rituals do we do now a days that are a reflection of this time of 'cosmic catastophy'?". His response was short "All of them.".
This new revelation about Mythology and about the universe changes thousands of years of history, and as evolution clearly showed how some species managed to evolve from earlier species.
The beginning of our history and all through our mythology and right into pre-history and history Saturn, the planet has change the face of our planet immensely. This combined with the later events of ~1500 and ~700 BC reinforced this fear and terror that we must have suffered. It has been written by every culture in the world. And all the events are the same, just with different names and different attributes.
Then its no mystery why all the symbols seem to meld together and seem to be benign and ordinary. But there are some that are odder and are interpreted differently.
Anthony Perratt, Plasma Researcher for Los Alamos National Labs has shown that petraglyphs in rocks are the same as hi-energy plasma instabilities of incredibly high amperage. The idea that magic might have been real, in a sense, it's facinating, and this odd mythological world would have "water's above" as undulating plasma auroras, and the electric conditions may have made many things possible, not the least of which is apparently lowering of gravity, or perhaps the St-Elmo's fire would shine from the tops of any high location. Including stone monuments.
We will examine these symbols in detail in the future.
This new revelation about Mythology and about the universe changes thousands of years of history, and as evolution clearly showed how some species managed to evolve from earlier species.
The beginning of our history and all through our mythology and right into pre-history and history Saturn, the planet has change the face of our planet immensely. This combined with the later events of ~1500 and ~700 BC reinforced this fear and terror that we must have suffered. It has been written by every culture in the world. And all the events are the same, just with different names and different attributes.
Then its no mystery why all the symbols seem to meld together and seem to be benign and ordinary. But there are some that are odder and are interpreted differently.
Anthony Perratt, Plasma Researcher for Los Alamos National Labs has shown that petraglyphs in rocks are the same as hi-energy plasma instabilities of incredibly high amperage. The idea that magic might have been real, in a sense, it's facinating, and this odd mythological world would have "water's above" as undulating plasma auroras, and the electric conditions may have made many things possible, not the least of which is apparently lowering of gravity, or perhaps the St-Elmo's fire would shine from the tops of any high location. Including stone monuments.
We will examine these symbols in detail in the future.
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Tunguska Requires Paradigm Shift
Hundreds of scientific papers, lots of books, essays and stories have been written about the Tunguska meteorite. The Tunguska Event has been featured in documentary and feature films. It has become popular for the writers and journalists to mention it in their works.There is barely an adult in Russia who has not heard about THE EVENT at least once in his or her life. And yet, there does not exist a person in this whole world of ours who could spell it out with certainty and based on solid evidence: "I know what it was!"
- Academician Nickolai V. Vassiliev is the leader of the Tunguska event Community.
Mr Vassiliev, I have your answer. You may require a bit of primer to understand it, but I have it.
Agreeably, the Tunguska event was caused by a bolide entering the earths atmosphere that morning of June 30th, 1908. That I think is understandable, comet or asteroid, it was something. What I think is being forgotten is that we have no direct witnesses to meteoric events on our planet. We see Meteor Crater, Arizona, and we see other evidence of past "impacts" but we do not have any direct witness to these events.
But we do have observational evidence of impacts that have not occurred on our planet. Often that evidence is dismissed or misunderstood because of it's confusing nature. It does things that cosmologists and astrophysicists do not understand, and as such the anomalous data is usually dismissed out of hand. This happens often, and the incidences of missed opportunity for understanding is dismissed with them. I will point out some of them.
Comet Beila broke up years before the Great Chicago Fire. During that it was noted that the comet's two pieces appeared to be connected by a luminous bridge by over 250,000 kms. (Other claims are showing that in later years it was over 2 million kms)
Comet Temple One was impacted by a copper projectile. The resulting explosion was supposed to be minimal, but at a distance of a few miles from the surface, there was an enormous explosion, then the impact.
Comet Shoemaker Levy slammed into the dark side of Jupiter. We still saw the light from earth. It was bright enough to have reflected off the clouds.
Bell Island, Newfoundland had an event in 1978 that looks like a smaller version of a Tunguska. Can these two events be compared?
That's some pretty odd events. In a universe of Gravity and gas laws that simply do not make sense. The comets should have not been connected, the impactor should have went "thud" and Shoemaker Levy should have disappeared into the clouds. What is going on?
What is being missed is the electrical fields and magnetic fields that bodies have. Just common sense and rubbing your hands through your hair on a cold day will show you the charge that can easily be built up.
Bolides hold a charge. They glow, as comets, when their orbits become elogated. The charge that a bolide carries is grounded to the electron voltage based on its distance from the sun. The sun itself, therefore, emanates an electric field that accelerates particles away from itself. This field is what causes the cometary displays we see. The comet's react to this field and as such they arc. Just like the "volcanoes" on Io.
Well, then, we see craters all over moons and planets and with this new knowledge we see that, the events we have seen in regards to comets can shed light on what might have caused these craters.
Tunguska was a bolide. This bolide approached earth and altered the night sky before the event, it's coma was larger than the distance between the earth and the moon but very dispersed. The rock itself, not large at all. It's electric field began to react with the magnetic field of the earth that night, the night before the impact. The rock began to enter the atmosphere and formed a visible coma which of course carried with it enormous charge. This would tear a path northward as it's "feelers" seeked the greatest source of potential difference. Which, without a doubt would be the caldera of an extinct volcano connecting directly to the Plasma Mantle of our planet.
Once this was located the discharge would begin. It would be in the form of an absolutely stupendous thunderbolt shooting down toward the ground from the bolide. The bolide would explode as all the electric potential is drained to the ground. The ground would be torn asunder in rippling waves and there should be flat bottomed craters. Which is indeed what Leonid Kulik said he saw, "10-50 foot holes several yards deep with flat bottoms". In fact it would likely jump to several nearby points aswell, nearer to the ground and so it would seem that there are several "explosions" based on the treefall.
Witness's said they saw a "Enormous Pillar of Fire" "Thunderclaps" and "An object glowing bluish white, too bright for the naked eye to look at". That's a 6 mile long electrical arc travelling toward to the ground as the bolide attempted to bleed off charge.
The patterns on the ground, the strange atmospheric glows, the witness reports and the physical destruction all match.
The herdsmen said it was Ogdy, a local deity who came down. There is obviously similarity to this and to what we think could be a deity. Electric effects have been shown to alter living tissues with their radiation. Here are some effects that can be explained with the electric model of comets, and of Tunguska itself:
+ Disturbances in the earths magnetic field.
+ Local Geomagnetic Storm
+ Reversal of soil Magnetism
+ An EMP
+ Aurora Displays before and after the event.
+ Genetic Mutations in plants and animals
+ Accelerated Growth of Plants
+ Radiation like Burns and deaths of animals.
+ Sphere's have been located of 'cosmic origin' in the area(NEW)
- Academician Nickolai V. Vassiliev is the leader of the Tunguska event Community.
Mr Vassiliev, I have your answer. You may require a bit of primer to understand it, but I have it.
Agreeably, the Tunguska event was caused by a bolide entering the earths atmosphere that morning of June 30th, 1908. That I think is understandable, comet or asteroid, it was something. What I think is being forgotten is that we have no direct witnesses to meteoric events on our planet. We see Meteor Crater, Arizona, and we see other evidence of past "impacts" but we do not have any direct witness to these events.
But we do have observational evidence of impacts that have not occurred on our planet. Often that evidence is dismissed or misunderstood because of it's confusing nature. It does things that cosmologists and astrophysicists do not understand, and as such the anomalous data is usually dismissed out of hand. This happens often, and the incidences of missed opportunity for understanding is dismissed with them. I will point out some of them.
Comet Beila broke up years before the Great Chicago Fire. During that it was noted that the comet's two pieces appeared to be connected by a luminous bridge by over 250,000 kms. (Other claims are showing that in later years it was over 2 million kms)
Comet Temple One was impacted by a copper projectile. The resulting explosion was supposed to be minimal, but at a distance of a few miles from the surface, there was an enormous explosion, then the impact.
Comet Shoemaker Levy slammed into the dark side of Jupiter. We still saw the light from earth. It was bright enough to have reflected off the clouds.
Bell Island, Newfoundland had an event in 1978 that looks like a smaller version of a Tunguska. Can these two events be compared?
That's some pretty odd events. In a universe of Gravity and gas laws that simply do not make sense. The comets should have not been connected, the impactor should have went "thud" and Shoemaker Levy should have disappeared into the clouds. What is going on?
What is being missed is the electrical fields and magnetic fields that bodies have. Just common sense and rubbing your hands through your hair on a cold day will show you the charge that can easily be built up.
Bolides hold a charge. They glow, as comets, when their orbits become elogated. The charge that a bolide carries is grounded to the electron voltage based on its distance from the sun. The sun itself, therefore, emanates an electric field that accelerates particles away from itself. This field is what causes the cometary displays we see. The comet's react to this field and as such they arc. Just like the "volcanoes" on Io.
Well, then, we see craters all over moons and planets and with this new knowledge we see that, the events we have seen in regards to comets can shed light on what might have caused these craters.
Tunguska was a bolide. This bolide approached earth and altered the night sky before the event, it's coma was larger than the distance between the earth and the moon but very dispersed. The rock itself, not large at all. It's electric field began to react with the magnetic field of the earth that night, the night before the impact. The rock began to enter the atmosphere and formed a visible coma which of course carried with it enormous charge. This would tear a path northward as it's "feelers" seeked the greatest source of potential difference. Which, without a doubt would be the caldera of an extinct volcano connecting directly to the Plasma Mantle of our planet.
Once this was located the discharge would begin. It would be in the form of an absolutely stupendous thunderbolt shooting down toward the ground from the bolide. The bolide would explode as all the electric potential is drained to the ground. The ground would be torn asunder in rippling waves and there should be flat bottomed craters. Which is indeed what Leonid Kulik said he saw, "10-50 foot holes several yards deep with flat bottoms". In fact it would likely jump to several nearby points aswell, nearer to the ground and so it would seem that there are several "explosions" based on the treefall.
Witness's said they saw a "Enormous Pillar of Fire" "Thunderclaps" and "An object glowing bluish white, too bright for the naked eye to look at". That's a 6 mile long electrical arc travelling toward to the ground as the bolide attempted to bleed off charge.
The patterns on the ground, the strange atmospheric glows, the witness reports and the physical destruction all match.
The herdsmen said it was Ogdy, a local deity who came down. There is obviously similarity to this and to what we think could be a deity. Electric effects have been shown to alter living tissues with their radiation. Here are some effects that can be explained with the electric model of comets, and of Tunguska itself:
+ Disturbances in the earths magnetic field.
+ Local Geomagnetic Storm
+ Reversal of soil Magnetism
+ An EMP
+ Aurora Displays before and after the event.
+ Genetic Mutations in plants and animals
+ Accelerated Growth of Plants
+ Radiation like Burns and deaths of animals.
+ Sphere's have been located of 'cosmic origin' in the area(NEW)
I hope this is a convincing argument for the Bolide theory. Of course, the Bolide from a new perspective, that of electrical comets and the plasma universe.
Monday, March 05, 2007
Wikipedia Censoring Science
Wikipedia Online Encyclopedia, information source to thousands is certainly not without flaws. I post here links to certain discussions in Plasma Cosmology that certainly seem to indicate a concerted effort to minimalize the way Plasma's work and to disconnect Cosmology and Electricity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Plasma_cosmology
In this you will see the consistent mocking and ridicule from 'scientists' who claim to work on reason but seem to be more about personal credibility and personal merit rather than noble prizes and reasoned thought.
I put this here for you to be able to have a say one of the more probable sciences of the future.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Plasma_cosmology
In this you will see the consistent mocking and ridicule from 'scientists' who claim to work on reason but seem to be more about personal credibility and personal merit rather than noble prizes and reasoned thought.
I put this here for you to be able to have a say one of the more probable sciences of the future.
Thursday, November 23, 2006
Self Made Disaster
Recently, in Aspen, as group of climatologists had a run in with Lowell Wood, pentagon Weaponeer who's idea it is to shoot particulates into the stratosphere to reduce the amount of heat the planet absorbs.
They'd be invisible to the naked eye, Wood argued, and harmless to the environment. Depending on the number of particles you injected, you could not only stabilize Greenland's polar ice -- you could actually grow it.
At first glance it sounded reasonable, but the counter arguments regarding the possibility of permanent damage to the planet is something to not be taken lightly. Recently, for example, I began to understand that individual water droplets, being di-poles unto themselves and tending to form at certain altitudes in flat even-bottomed sheets, could be a form of condensation formed by electrical/magnetic reactions to the magnetic field of the earth. It could possibily change the principles of meteorology if we could prove an interaction between water ions while suspended in a electric/magnetic field, and terrain and other ground features.
A common man looking at this idea through the new paradigm can see the prophetic words in the article, written by Lester Brown, are not words to be taken lightly. We do not know what is going on up there in our skies and for some reason they do not make sense. But we are looking at the skies as electrically neutral. This is not the case, Tornadoes have been shown to be electric phenomenon and this means our atmosphere, the buffer between the capacitors of the planet's surface and the ionosphere, has clearly the possible capacity to alter and affect cloud formation and it's not just heat and gas laws which have to be taken into consideration.
Lester Brown, one of the godfathers of the environmental movement and president of the Earth Policy Institute, sees geoengineering as "another step down the road of actively managing the planet -- something we've already proven we're not terribly good at. The whole idea of geoengineering is based on an assumption that we know how this all works, when in truth we haven't a clue."
Lester is right, we will never have a clue in an electrically neutral universe.
They'd be invisible to the naked eye, Wood argued, and harmless to the environment. Depending on the number of particles you injected, you could not only stabilize Greenland's polar ice -- you could actually grow it.
At first glance it sounded reasonable, but the counter arguments regarding the possibility of permanent damage to the planet is something to not be taken lightly. Recently, for example, I began to understand that individual water droplets, being di-poles unto themselves and tending to form at certain altitudes in flat even-bottomed sheets, could be a form of condensation formed by electrical/magnetic reactions to the magnetic field of the earth. It could possibily change the principles of meteorology if we could prove an interaction between water ions while suspended in a electric/magnetic field, and terrain and other ground features.
A common man looking at this idea through the new paradigm can see the prophetic words in the article, written by Lester Brown, are not words to be taken lightly. We do not know what is going on up there in our skies and for some reason they do not make sense. But we are looking at the skies as electrically neutral. This is not the case, Tornadoes have been shown to be electric phenomenon and this means our atmosphere, the buffer between the capacitors of the planet's surface and the ionosphere, has clearly the possible capacity to alter and affect cloud formation and it's not just heat and gas laws which have to be taken into consideration.
Lester Brown, one of the godfathers of the environmental movement and president of the Earth Policy Institute, sees geoengineering as "another step down the road of actively managing the planet -- something we've already proven we're not terribly good at. The whole idea of geoengineering is based on an assumption that we know how this all works, when in truth we haven't a clue."
Lester is right, we will never have a clue in an electrically neutral universe.
Monday, November 20, 2006
The Thunderbolt Cometh
Recently the discoveries of David Talbott and others are finally garnering the recognition they deserve. I am happy to direct people who are often unable to locate material themselves to places where they would be able to see information on the Plasma Universe and of course all the paradigm shifting that it entails.
Cosmology Quest, Part 1 , Part 2 , published a documentary on the shifting paradigm in cosmology and the tenuous 'epicycles' on which our prima-facia version of the universe rests on. This show breaks down the finer points of the Big Bang's cascade of recent assumptions and shows, with credibility, that the big bang is not following reason, but faith.
Thunderbolts of the Gods, The Tutorial , is an eyeopening one hour video that explores the impact of paradigm on the sciences. It explores a variety of topics which are now different in light of the new material. Seemingly incongrous facts from around the world suddenly make sense for the first time under a new and rationally scientific approach.
If you have an opportunity to review the selections above, please do.
Cosmology Quest, Part 1 , Part 2 , published a documentary on the shifting paradigm in cosmology and the tenuous 'epicycles' on which our prima-facia version of the universe rests on. This show breaks down the finer points of the Big Bang's cascade of recent assumptions and shows, with credibility, that the big bang is not following reason, but faith.
Thunderbolts of the Gods, The Tutorial , is an eyeopening one hour video that explores the impact of paradigm on the sciences. It explores a variety of topics which are now different in light of the new material. Seemingly incongrous facts from around the world suddenly make sense for the first time under a new and rationally scientific approach.
If you have an opportunity to review the selections above, please do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)